Remove Shortcut From Pen Drive

Click on "Start" -->Run --> type cmd and click on OK.
Here I assume your pen drive letter as G:
Enter this command.


attrib -h -r -s /s /d g:\*.*


You can copy the above command --> Right-click in the Command Prompt and
paste it.
Note : Don't forget to replace the letter g with your pen drive letter.
Now press "Enter".
Now check for your files and folder in Pen Drive.





Posted By Administrator


Please click on the ads on either side of the page so as to show that this blog is active.Please support us.Please talk about us.Enjoy.....

FTP and SFTP

FTP (File Transfer Protocol) is an older protocol for moving files back and forth over the Internet and other networks. All modern web browsers still speak FTP, which was sometimes used as a substitute for HTTP in the early days of the web. FTP is still used often as a means of downloading large files.


Many web hosts still offer FTP as the preferred way of uploading new web pages to a website. However, because there is no encryption of your password, FTP is not the best choice for this purpose. And since there is no encryption of the files being moved, FTP is a poor choice indeed for more sensitive information.


SFTP (Secure FTP) is a popular replacement. Built on SSL, SFTP is just as secure as HTTPS. And most modern FTP clients, such as the free, high-quality FileZilla program for Windows, support both FTP and SFTP. SFTP offers a set of features quite similar to FTP and will be immediately familiar to FTP users, although it works quite differently "under the hood."


Every Windows, MacOS X and Linux system comes standard with a simple command line FTP client program. And MacOS X and Linux also have command line SFTP clients as standard equipment. In addition, MacOS X supports connections to FTP servers in a user-friendly way, right out of the box (you can find a great tutorial on creativemac.com).
Binary Mode and ASCII Mode in FTP
"Classic," non-secure FTP can move files in two major ways: "binary mode" and "ASCII mode." Binary mode just moves the file down the wire without modifying anything... and this is, almost always, what we want today.


"ASCII mode" is sometimes used for plain-text (usually, .txt) files. ASCII mode, named for the American Standard Code for Information Interchange which determines what byte stands for each letter, number or other character in text, corrects for differences in the way line endings are stored in text files. Windows traditionally uses a carriage return (represented by an ASCII value of 13) followed by a line feed (represented by 10). Unix typically expects just the line feed. And MacOS, at least prior to MacOS X, preferred a carriage return only.


Today, though, most text-editing and viewing programs can view text files that follow any of these three conventions (including Microsoft Word, and the free WordPad program that comes with Windows, but excluding a few annoying holdovers like Windows Notepad). So ASCII mode doesn't do us much good. These days ASCII mode is mostly an annoyance, something people accidentally leave on in a very old fashioned command-line FTP program, or accidentally turn on in a newer one. And when you're moving a program, an image or anything else with an exact file format that must not be modified, that means you get garbage instead of the file you wanted.


The norm today is for FTP to simply ship files unchanged in binary mode.


Once upon a time there was also something called "TENEX mode," to move files between computers that didn't even use the same number of bits to represent a byte. Yes, FTP has been around that long! But TENEX mode doesn't come up as an issue these days, and we're all happier for it.





Posted By Administrator


Please click on the ads on either side of the page so as to show that this blog is active.Please support us.Please talk about us.Enjoy.....

IE9 vs Chrome 10 vs Firefox 4 vs Opera 11.01 vs Safari 5 - The BIG browser benchmark

Now that Mozilla has finally released Firefox 4 to the masses, it’s time for a BIG browser benchmark where we take the leading browsers and pit them against four of the toughest benchmark tests available to see which is the tortoise, and which is the hare.
Note: This post has been updated for the final release of Firefox 4.
Here are the browsers that will be run:
Internet Explorer 9 (9.0.8112.16421) 32-bit
Internet Explorer 9 (9.0.8112.16421) 64-bit
Firefox 4
Chrome 10.0.648.151
Safari 5.0.4
Opera 11.01
Here are the tests that the browsers will face:
SunSpider javascript 0.9.1 - A javascript benchmark developed by Mozilla with a focus on real-world problem solving.
V8 Benchmark Suite - A pure javascript benchmark used by Google to to tune the V8 javascript engine.
Peacekeeper - FutureMark’s javascript test which stress-tests features such as animation, navigation, forms and other commonly utilized tasks.
Kraken 1.0 - Another javascript benchmark developed by Mozilla. This is based on SunSpider but features some enhancements.
All testing carried out on a Windows 7 64-bit machine running a Q9300 2.5GHz quad-core processor with 4GB of RAM and an NVIDIA GTX 260 graphics card.
On with the testing!

SunSpider javascript Benchmark


Hare: IE9 32-bit
Tortoise: IE9 64-bit

V8 Benchmark


Hare: Chrome 10
Tortoise: IE9 64-bit
Peacekeeper Benchmark


Hare: Chrome 10
Tortoise: Firefox 4
Kraken Benchmark


Hare: Firefox 4
Tortoise: IE9 64-bit
Conclusion
OK, so what conclusions can we draw? Well, let’s begin with the obvious and say that Internet Explorer 9 64-bit is an absolute dog when it comes to javascript performance. This is to be expected given that IE 9 64-bit is using an older, slower javascript engine, while IE 9 32-bit was using the newer, more efficient Chakra JIT.
OK, with the loser out of the way, what’s the winning browser? Well, out of the four benchmarks, Chrome 10 won two, IE9 32-bit won one and Firefox 4 won one, so in the strictest sense, Chrome 10 is the winner. But in the SunSpider test there is so little separating the four fastest browsers (a shade over 40 milliseconds) that you could almost say it is a tie. Then there’s the V8 test, which Chrome 10 aces, but then that’s to be expected given that Google, by its own admission, use that benchmark to tune the V8 javascript engine.
So, what’s the conclusion? Simple, IE9 64-bit is shockingly bad, and all the other browsers are, on the whole, pretty evenly matched. I’m pleasantly surprised that IE9 32-bit actually aces the SunSpider test, but I expect that over the coming weeks Google will manage to catch up and take the lead once again (Microsoft’s painfully slow update cycle for IE (especially compared with Google’s aggressive update cycle) works against it in the long run. Microsoft has worked hard on IE, taking it from being the slowest in the pack to one of the fastest. That itself is worthy of recognition.

Note: The 64-bit version of IE is only available to those with a 64-bit OS, and even then you’ve got to go searching for it. My advice, don’t bother.
Bottom line, I really don’t think that javascript performance is an issue any more, and certainly in real-world testing it’s hard to see a difference between the browsers (some HTML 5 sites not withstanding, given that many are optimized for a particular browser). In fact, unless one of the players managed to boost javascript performance by an order of magnitude, shaving a few milliseconds off here and there hardly matters any more.









Posted By Administrator


Please click on the ads on either side of the page so as to show that this blog is active.Please support us.Please talk about us.Enjoy.....

Firefox 4 vs. Chrome 11 Beta

It was a big week in the never-ending Internet browsers race. First, Firefox 4 was finally launched two days ago  – last of the next generation browsers to hit the market,  trailing behind Chrome 10 and Internet Explorer 9. It brought some new and interesting changes to UI – a brightly colored Firefox start button, that looks like something nicked from a recent Opera version, plus a tab-pinning function, no doubt nicked from Google. I just wish that Firefox would go further with their “borrowing” spree and include a cool IE9’s option to pin the websites to your task bar. But this release was not only about reused UI ideas. Reviewers praised new Firefox for its improved speed, GPU acceleration, and compatibility with latest and greatest standards, including HTML5. Over all, it’s a very modern, lean and mean browser, a clear improvement over previous 3.6 version.


The reactions were overall very positive, so no wonder Google, fiercely competing with Firefox for a second spot in the browser market, decided to steal some of its thunder and scrambled to push the new Chrome beta out of the door. They managed to do so yesterday, and after just a couple of hours, tech fanatics all around the globe were commenting various new Chrome features. So how does new Chrome compare to new Firefox? While Firefox 4 seems to be concentrating more on general polish, increased speed, and some UI changes, Chrome creators actually attempted to came up with something new. First up is the speech input option. Although it won’t help you much if you’re a non-native speaker with a runny nose, it works well enough, and Google claims that popular websites will pick this one up. Soon, you might be able to ask Google for a search query, or name things you want to look for on eBay.


But that’s not everything. There are also 3D Cascading Style Sheets. If you’re not a tech-oriented person, this may sound like a mouthful. But to put things simply, 3D CSS will allow websites to include some nifty 3d effects and transformations, like page flips or cylindrical menu’s, or page content bending under the mouse cursor. But that’s only if webmasters take time to code the effects visible only to a small number of browsers. Then, there is also speed. Even though it’s only an unpolished, beta version, Chrome 11 still manages to outperform Firefox 4 in several benchmarks, including javascript  Sunspider and Futuremark’s Peacekeeper. Which one would I pick? Well, it’s a bit unfair to compare a finished product, like Firefox 4, to beta test version, even though Chrome 11 Beta is surprisingly stable and bug-free. Unfortunately, most of the improvements offered by Chrome will become useful only after websites adapt them. And by that time, Firefox will no doubt be sporting similar features. It seems that for now Chrome and Firefox are in a deadlock, with neither likely to increase the market share. Because never-ending races don’t just end like that, you know.

Posted By Administrator

Please click on the ads on either side of the page so as to show that this blog is active.Please support us.Please talk about us.Enjoy.....

India Develops $35 Tablet for Its School

The $35 Android based Tablet PC which the govt. had announced last year is finally going to launch this June. 

The Indian Government and Canadian company Datawind have just released the Akash, a 7″ Android based Tablet.

The Indian government has contracted to buy some 8 to 10 million of the devices by March 2012 and will initially be giving the devices away to students for free and when available commercially will sell for around $38.

“The rich have access to the digital world, the poor and ordinary have been excluded. Aakash will end that digital divide,” Telecoms and Education Minister Kapil Sibal told The Times of India.

Based on  Android 2.2 ( Froyo ) , a 7-inch resistive touch screen ( 800-x-480) , a 366-MHz processor, 256MB of RAM, 2GB of internal storage, a microSD slot, WiFi, GPRS modem, two USB ports, a 3.5mm headphone jack  and a 2100 mAh battery that lasts around 3 hours, the specifications don’t look that impressive. The device will however go a long way in enabling many of India’s 1.2 billion people  who cannot afford more expensive units and  whom only around 8% currently have Internet Access.

There is no such news on the availability of this Device on a commercial level  as the device is meant for Students who are not able to afford costly PCs.

Windows 8 comes with new and redesigned boot process.

Microsoft is determined to make some changes related to Windows 8 user interface, and if you have seen new Windows 8 Blue Screen of Death, you’re probably going to like this new and improved boot process.


Since the early days of Windows, boot process looked filled with codes and numbers, that weren’t understandable to the average user, and now with Windows 8, Microsoft decided to change that. Now instead of codes, you’ll get only the visual interface that lets you choose which operating system you want to use, in case you have two of them. In addition, you can use advanced options, such as accessing USB flash drive, changing default OS, or even running command prompt, all in new and visual user interface. We also have to mention that this new interface fully supports touch input, so it is fully optimized for touchscreen monitors and tablets.
New boot process looks great, and it’s a great improvement compared to the old textual boot, but we still have to wait and see how advanced users will react to it.

Fuse Powerslice Charging Station can charge up to four devices simultainiously .

Recharging our portable devices is sometimes a tedious task, and we have seen all sorts of chargers on the market, and if you’re looking for a charger that can recharge several devices simultaneously, Fuse Powerslice Charging Station might be the right thing for you. 


 

Fuse Powerslice Charging Station is comprised of base unit and three pie-shaped slices, and what makes this charger unique is that it can recharge four devices simultaneously. We have to mention that each slice can recharge different type of device such as iPhone/iPod touch, Samsung smart-phones, or LG handsets. In addition, there is an USB port on the base of the charger, so you can easily attach and recharge any USB device as well.

Fuse Powerslice Charging Station might be the right charger for you, especially if you have several devices that you want to recharge at the same time. As for the price, Fuse Powerslice Charging Station is priced at $44.99, and you can purchase additional slices for $9.99 each.